I have never trusted the stories societies tell themselves about progress. They are too smooth, too triumphant, too eager to forget the debris accumulating at the edges of the map. When I write about society and innovation, I am not crafting prophecies; I am excavating the layers of a world we already inhabit. The future is simply the present, stripped of its illusions. My writing has emerged from that simple, uncomfortable truth.

I have spent a lifetime watching people carry the weight of systems they did not build and cannot easily escape. The sociological lens was not a choice for me—it was the only way to see clearly. The characters in my world, even the nameless ones, are shaped by infrastructure, by scarcity, by the long shadows cast by centuries of inequity. As a child of multilingual Benelux, I learned early that identities are built from the friction of history, not from its certainties. As an adult, I learned that societies are similarly assembled: imperfectly, unevenly, at the mercy of institutions large enough to define our lives but too abstract to hold accountable.

I often wonder why people assume that technology is neutral. It isn’t. Innovation reflects the social architecture it emerges from, the same way a tree reflects the soil beneath it. In my fiction, devices and tools never function as miracle cures. They are mirrors—sometimes flattering, often harsh—showing how technology amplifies the ethics of those who wield it. I write about machines the way ecologists write about forests: as components of interdependent systems, easily corrupted by monoculture, strengthened by diversity, and undone by greed.

My futurism has always been eco-socialist at its core, though that word carries more baggage than I ever intended to shoulder. What I mean is simple: any future worth imagining must honor the living world, not merely survive within it. A society that treats the planet as expendable will inevitably treat people the same way. The collapse of ecosystems and the collapse of social safety nets are not parallel tragedies; they are the same tragedy, viewed from two vantage points. I refuse to write futures where ecological devastation is inevitable or where human dignity becomes a luxury good.

People sometimes assume my work is dystopian. I disagree. Dystopia is a dead end; my worlds are a crossroads. I write about communities on the brink not to fetishize catastrophe but to show the quiet, stubborn genius of ordinary people. Innovation, as I understand it, is not born in laboratories or corporate incubators but among neighbors who share water during a blackout, migrants who build infrastructure no one else bothered to imagine, caretakers who reinvent systems simply by refusing to let someone fall through them. That, to me, is the future: people refusing to surrender.

Perhaps this is why my writing often circles back to solidarity. I have no faith in individual salvation narratives. They are comforting, yes, but dishonest. Every society that survives—truly survives—does so through collective effort. My eco-socialism is not a manifesto but rather a vocabulary for imagining more humane, interdependent futures. Futures where the success of one community is not predicated on the erasure of another. Futures where technological sophistication is measured not by speed or profit, but by whether it strengthens the commons. Futures where care is not an afterthought but the operating system.

I write from the conviction that innovation divorced from empathy is merely an upgrade to oppression. You cannot repair the world with tools designed to deepen its fractures. So my stories insist on another path: one where progress is redefined as the ability to heal, redistribute, and reconnect. One where the heroic act is not winning, but sustaining. One where the most advanced technology is a social contract that refuses to break under pressure.

If my writing has a single thesis, it is this: life continues because people insist on it together. Not through spectacle, but through cooperation. Not through domination, but through reciprocity. The future I imagine is fragile, yes, but it is also luminous in places—lit by the ingenuity of those who have nothing left to lose and therefore everything to create.

These beliefs are not theoretical for me. They are the scaffolding of my life, the grammar of my politics, the compass for my imagination. Every page I write is an argument: that despite everything we have broken, humanity still has the capacity to choose repair over ruin.

And in the quiet hours, when I return to the worlds I’m building, I remind myself of the simple truth that underpins them all: the future is not written. But it will be, and it will be written by all of us.

Sometimes, the simplest moments hold the deepest wisdom. Let your thoughts settle, and clarity will find you. Use this quote space to share something inspirational or reflective, perfectly aligned with the theme of your article.

.